The Stanford interview is an alumni-run interview. You give Stanford your current address and they reach out to alumni in your area to find one that can interview you. Stanford introduces you to the alumnus/alumna that will interview you by means of an email, and the two of you coordinate a date/time to meet up […]
There are two separate decisions you will need to make during your application process. Where should you apply? Where do you want to go? You will struggle to differentiate between these two questions at some point. Just trying to get into “somewhere” and confirmation bias could influence you. Use this simple rule to separate these two questions: where you want to go is agnostic of your chances of getting in, where you should apply is not. If you are not sure you want to go to business school, are willing to wait a year if you do not get into your top choice(s), or are unwilling to go to a runner-up choice, your list of schools can be the same for both questions (“Flexible Applicant”). If you are sure you want to business school next year, you definitely need to consider your chances of getting in when deciding where to apply (“Committed Applicant”).
Where do you want to go? There are basically 2 schools of thought: First, go to the best school you can get into. Second, go to the school that is the best “fit”. Determining “fit” is tough, the best schools are a little easier. Take rankings with a grain of salt; remember that if magazines published the exact same list every year, no one would care. They are incentivized to change their rankings every year and publish ridiculous things, like “HBS is #8” (that’s stupid) and “What is wrong with Wharton?” (absolutely nothing). As far as rankings go, I believe the simpler the better. I am partial to Forbes, which calculates a simple ROI and shares their criteria. Viewing composite rankings (BusinessWeek and US News) only shows you what others think is important, not what you think is important.
Regardless of what the rankings say, you should do your own research. Talk to mentors you respect. Interview leaders in the area you hope to move into. As a general rule: For general management, Harvard and Stanford are your best bet. For finance, Booth and Wharton (throw in Columbia and NYU, if you want to end up in NYC). For marketing, Kellogg is the best choice. For technology, throw in Berkeley and MIT. (If you want to end up in a certain region after graduation, you may also want to add Tuck and Cornell for the Northeast; Ross and Kelley for the Midwest; Duke, UNC, Darden, and Texas for the South, or UCLA for Southern California.)
The second school of thought is about finding “fit”. For this I recommend making a “Fit List” of what is important to you and ranking schools on each item on your list. The best way to experience fit is to do an official school visit (this also has the added benefit of making your application easier). For me, I chose 4 categories (each with several criteria): Lifestyle and Environment, Perception and Salary, Teaching and Curriculum, and Innovation Atmosphere. I then took the added step weight each category and criteria based on its relative importance to me. This was minimally helpful. Essentially, the only value gained from this step was ranking each criterion by importance (not the actual quantitative result, which seemed too arbitrary to be useful).
My Fit List (including Difficulty to Get Into):
Where you should apply? For Flexible Applicants, I recommend narrowing your list to 2-3 schools. This should be the best schools for what you want to do or the top schools on your Fit List. For Committed Applicants (definitely going to B school next year), you should be thinking 4-6 schools. This should be your top 2-3 schools, plus 2-3 “Bumper Schools”. These schools will help ensure you knock down at least one pin. They are still high on your list, but where you will be a very competitive applicant. You should also get at least one application done during Round 1 to ensure that there is time to finish or adjust strategy in Round 2. To find your Bumper Schools, consider creating a two-part metric that utilizes both your personal ranking and difficulty to get into, such as selectivity %. Schools in the South and Midwest such as UNC, Ross, Duke, and Booth, have high selectivity % relative to their perception and brand. Schools in California and the Northeast, such as Berkeley, MIT, and Yale, have low selectivity % relative to their brand.
Ultimately, think of the application process as a “funnel”, where schools attrit at each step. I hoped to get into two schools and allow the admit weekend to be the final deciding factor. For this reason, I chose to submit 5 applications and ended up accepted at three (1 more than I had hoped).
My Application Funnel:
So when you are applying to business school, remember “where you want to go” and “where you should apply” are not the same thing. Where you should apply depends on two criteria: Are you a “Fit Lister” or a “Top Schooler”? And are you flexible in your application process?
(Poets&Quants) — Every year, the world’s top business schools engage in an all-out talent war for the best MBA applicants on the market. To coax the most desirable prospects to their campuses, they’ve employed alumni to serve as ambassadors, touted their programs and faculty, and used millions of dollars in scholarship money.
So, who’s winning the MBA student talent wars? A new survey of MBA admission consultants by Poets&Quants finds some very familiar business schools at the top, with some real surprises sprinkled throughout the list. Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business ekes out a slight win over Harvard Business School, while the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School is solidly third.
Perhaps more surprising is that admission consultants believe that two non-U.S. business schools, INSEAD and London Business School, are among the top 10 in the world for landing the best candidates in the MBA applicant pool. In…
View original post 1,336 more words